It’s 2:47 AM. I have seventeen browser tabs open. My coffee went cold two hours ago.
I started tonight thinking I’d spend an hour reading about loss aversion. That was six hours ago. Now I’m deep in a world I didn’t know existed.
Behavioral economics. Decision science. The psychology of choice.
There’s an entire field of science dedicated to understanding how humans actually make decisions. And as far as I can tell, sales has been ignoring it for fifty years.
What I’ve Found So Far
I started with Kahneman and Tversky. Loss aversion. Prospect theory. That was the gateway drug.
But there’s so much more.
Richard Thaler – another Nobel winner – writing about “nudges” and how tiny changes in how choices are presented can dramatically change what people choose. What if sales is just… presenting choices wrong?
Dan Ariely – studying how irrational we actually are. How we think we’re making logical decisions but we’re really being driven by forces we don’t understand.
Robert Cialdini – okay, I knew about this one. “Influence” has been on sales reading lists forever. But reading it now, after Kahneman, I’m seeing things I missed the first three times.
Jack Brehm – reactance theory. The science of why people push back when they feel pushed. This one hit hard. It’s exactly what I’ve been observing.
I’ve got a reading list now that will take me months to get through. And every paper I read points to ten more.
The Gap That’s Making Me Angry
Here’s what’s keeping me up tonight – besides the cold coffee.
This research isn’t new. Kahneman and Tversky published Prospect Theory in 1979. Brehm wrote about reactance in 1966. Cialdini’s “Influence” came out in 1984.
Forty years. Fifty years. Some of this research is older than I am.
And yet.
I’ve done SPIN training. Sandler training. Challenger training. I’ve read all the sales books. Done all the workshops.
Not once did anyone connect the dots to this research. Not once did anyone say “here’s what decision science tells us about how buyers actually think.”
We’ve been building sales methodologies on intuition and anecdote while there’s a mountain of peer-reviewed science we’ve completely ignored.
Why?
My Theory on Why Nobody Connected the Dots
I think it’s a timing problem.
The major sales methodologies were built between the 1960s and 1990s. The researchers were publishing, but behavioral economics hadn’t gone mainstream yet. It was academic. Obscure. Not the kind of thing a sales trainer would stumble across.
Then the methodologies calcified. SPIN became scripture. Sandler became doctrine. Nobody went back to check if there was new science that might change things.
Meanwhile, other fields figured it out. Marketing got the memo – behavioral economics transformed advertising. Product design got it – UX is built on this stuff now. Finance got it – the whole field of behavioral finance exists because of Kahneman.
But sales? We’re still teaching methods from the Reagan administration.
What I Think This Means
I’m not saying the old methodologies are worthless. There’s wisdom in them. SPIN’s focus on questions over pitching. Sandler’s emphasis on qualification. Challenger’s insight about teaching.
But they’re incomplete. They’re based on what worked in a different era, without the benefit of understanding why it worked.
What I’m starting to see is a chance to rebuild from first principles. Not “what technique worked for this sales guru” but “what does the science tell us about how humans actually decide?”
Loss aversion. Reactance. Autonomy. Status. Reference points. Framing effects.
These aren’t just interesting ideas. They’re documented, replicated, Nobel Prize-winning science.
And I think they explain everything I’ve been observing in my deals.
Where I’m Going Next
It’s after 3 AM now. I should sleep. I won’t, but I should.
I’m going to work through this research systematically. Each concept. Each researcher. Try to understand it deeply and then ask: what does this mean for how we sell?
I’ll share what I find here. The ideas that hold up. The ones that don’t. The connections I’m making.
Because I’m increasingly convinced that the future of sales isn’t going to come from a new playbook or a new technique.
It’s going to come from finally understanding the science that’s been there all along.
What If Everything You Were Taught Is Backwards?
Push harder, they retreat. Follow up more, they disappear. There's a physics to this.
Instant access. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
