I’ve been in sales for thirty years. I’ve read the books. Taken the trainings. Taught the methodologies to others. I know the playbook cold.
And lately, I can’t shake the feeling that something about it is fundamentally wrong.
Not a little off. Not outdated around the edges. Wrong at the foundation.
The frustrating part is I can’t articulate what it is. It’s like a word on the tip of your tongue – you can feel the shape of it, but you can’t quite say it.
The Threads I Keep Pulling
Here’s what I keep coming back to:
Thirty years ago, I started noticing that certain people had a presence – a magnetism – that drew others to them. They weren’t trying. They weren’t pushing. They just existed in a way that made people want to be around them. I wrote about this the other day. I’ve been thinking about it for decades.
Last week, I lost a deal I should have won. Did everything right. Better product, better price, better ROI story. Lost anyway. The competitor didn’t out-sell me – they out-listened me. Made the buyer do the work. And somehow that made the buyer more committed to them.
I keep watching top performers – the ones who consistently crush it – and they don’t sell the way we teach people to sell. They’re quieter. Less pushy. More patient. They seem to do less, not more.
These observations feel connected. I just don’t know how yet.
The Dissonance
Every sales methodology I know says some version of the same thing:
Be proactive. Control the conversation. Overcome objections. Create urgency. Always be closing. Push through resistance. More activity equals more results.
Push. Push. Push.
And yet…
The people with natural presence don’t push. They pull.
The rep who beat me didn’t push. He pulled back and let the buyer come to him.
The top performers I’ve watched over thirty years don’t push the way the training says. They create conditions where buyers move themselves.
There’s a disconnect between what we teach and what actually works. I’ve been seeing it for years. I just never stopped long enough to really look at it.
What If It’s Backwards?
Here’s the thought that keeps nagging at me:
What if the entire model is backwards?
What if pushing creates resistance instead of movement?
What if talking more makes buyers trust less?
What if trying to convince people makes them more skeptical?
What if the reason “no decision” wins so often is because we’re creating the very resistance we’re trying to overcome?
I don’t have proof. I don’t have a framework. I just have this growing suspicion that everything I’ve been taught – everything I’ve taught others – might be exactly wrong.

The Human Element
Here’s what I keep coming back to: sales is just human interaction. Two people (or groups of people) trying to figure out if they should work together.
And in every other human interaction, we know that pushing doesn’t work.
Push someone to like you and they’ll pull away. Push someone to agree with you and they’ll dig in. Push someone to do something and they’ll resist – even if it’s something they wanted to do.
We know this intuitively. We experience it every day. And yet we walk into sales situations and throw all of that out the window. We push. We convince. We overcome. We close.
Why do we think buyers are somehow exempt from basic human psychology?
I Don’t Know Where This Goes
I’m writing this down because I need to get it out of my head. I don’t have answers. I barely have coherent questions.
But something is clicking into place. Slowly. Like pieces of a puzzle I’ve been carrying around for thirty years that are finally starting to fit together.
The presence thing. The deal I lost. The top performers who break the rules. The human psychology we ignore. The push that creates resistance.
There’s a thread running through all of it. I can feel it.
I just can’t name it yet.
But I’m going to keep pulling until I can.
Your Pipeline Isn't Dying. It Was Never Alive.
Activity isn't agreement. Motion isn't progress. Time to learn the difference.
Instant access. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.